Catalogue Exposants





NoviQ fournit des solutions innovantes et de qualité supérieure pour toute application nécessitant du codage, marquage, traçabilité ou vérification d’impression de votre produit ou packaging.
Codage Offline (hors ligne de production) de votre packaging en carton ou plastique avec nos margeurs et dépileurs automatiques ou semi-automatiques.
Codage Online (sur ligne de production ou convoyeur), appliqué directement sur vos produits ou packaging secondaire.


Nouveautés produits

  • 5 Reasons To Consider 'Offline Date Coding' Of Food Sleeves

    If you are coding onto sleeves or watchstrap bands positioning can be a real issue. Coding online may struggle to code packs that are awkwardly shaped or have hard-to-reach print areas. On an offline system the pack is presented to the coding device in flat form with the print area readily accessible. This allows for consistently accurate code positioning, increasing line efficiency and reducing waste that results from poorly printed packs

    For companies who are coding packs by hand, an automatic offline coding system will reduce labour costs and speed up production.

    With the addition of a label applicator, offline coding systems can carry out labelling and coding in one operation. This dual functionality is very useful when producing ‘meal deal’ packs or running promotions. Take a sandwich wedge pack: applying a code online is fairly straightforward, but applying a label at the same time is not so easy due to the awkward pack orientation.

    An offline coder is the ideal solution for trial products, it allows you to minimise capital outlay whilst ensuring new products are coded according to retailer and regulatory requirements, without impacting on other production.

    Under pressure due to seasonal variations, getting more operators on the job might seem like the easiest way of increasing capacity during seasonal peaks. But in actual fact, purchasing an offline coder to cope with increased production and seasonal lines is usually more cost effective, owing to the speed, flexibility and accuracy benefits it brings.

  • Thermal Ink Jet Coding Solutions Drive down cost

    Cost savings are welcome at any time, but the exceptional pressure being put on manufacturers by today’s rapidly rising raw material prices is forcing many to re-examine their operations for fresh ways to save money and protect their margins. With that in mind, we can expect a surge in popularity for coding systems based on convenient, cost-effective thermal inkjet (TIJ) technology, argues Steve Ryan, UK sales manager at Rotech.

    The problem is most acute in price-sensitive markets such as food. The Food and Drink Federation have reported in March 2017 that an overwhelming majority (90% per cent) have seen the price of ingredients and raw materials increase in recent months. They expect these costs to continue to rise over the next two years. Big brands such as such as Marmite, Toblerone and Birds Eye have all hit the headlines, with consumers complaining of empty shelves, ‘shrinkflation’ and rising prices respectively. Manufacturers are therefore looking for ways to maintain their margins without impacting on consumers, and that means making automation cost savings including production peripherals such as coding technology.

    When it comes to the technologies used for marking packs with essential data such as barcodes, batch numbers or use by dates, the clear winner in terms convenience, cleanliness, clarity and cost is TIJ, when compared with more-widely used continuous inkjet (CIJ) coding. Until a few years ago, CIJ was the obvious choice to print onto a variety of packaging, largely because TIJ struggled to cope with printing on non-porous substrates. The arrival of solvent-based TIJ technology means that printing on glossy, consumer-ready packaging is no longer an issue, while the cost savings associated with TIJ provide a strong incentive for greater TIJ uptake. Nowadays, TIJ scores against both the above when looking at capital outlay, consumable & disposal costs.

    Starting with the capital outlay, the initial installed cost of TIJ is around half that of more complex CIJ systems. Industrial TIJ is a younger technology than CIJ and this price advantage is a relatively recent phenomenon that’s emerged as a result of improving economies of scale.
    On a related note, the extra complexity of CIJ means that CIJ coding systems are bigger too. They need a separate control unit and pumps, which adds up to a system the size of a chair. In contrast, a TIJ system relies on a self-contained cartridge and typically takes up the same space as a paperback book, making it easy to squeeze into tight spaces around the production line.

    What’s more, the gap gets wider throughout the life of the systems, the cost of consumables and service contracts are factored in.
    The ongoing cost of consumables stacks up in favour of TIJ. A TIJ cartridge can print around 4 million individual characters (or 400,000 ten-character lines) in its lifetime requiring significantly less expenditure than alternative technologies. A CIJ system prints uses a combination of ink and make-up fluid which can be costly. TIJ most certainly works out more cost effective per character.

    Even waste disposal costs come out in favour of TIJ, since TIJ cartridges can be recycled or disposed of in normal waste, whereas containers contaminated with the ink and solvents used in CIJ must be treated as hazardous waste and disposed of by a specialist company attracting further expenditure.
    TIJ printers use a simple and robust cartridge system that combines both a printhead and ink supply system. Replacing the print cartridge effectively replaces the entire ink delivery system, and this can be done within a few seconds, minimising downtime and eliminating the need for repairs and service contracts. In contrast, CIJ systems require regular servicing at around 6,000-hour intervals. Services visits attract additional costs to the long term of costs of CIJ.
    The other main contender for coding on consumer packaging is thermal transfer (TT) technology. This uses a thermal transfer printhead and ribbon that make contact with a flexible substrate (such as synthetic films or labels). Miniature printing elements located under a glass coating are precisely heated, then pressed against the ribbon to transfer ink to the target substrate. Not only is the initial investment cost lower for TIJ but it’s must less to install than a TT system which requires regular servicing and it can be a headache to dispose of the used ribbon and cores.

    Of course, TIJ is not without its limitations and is not perfect for every application. That’s why Rotech continues to work with partners to provide coding solutions based on the full range of printing technologies. However, for the majority of packaged consumer products, TIJ offers advantages over CIJ in terms of convenience, cleanliness and clarity, as well as cost.